Monday, May 29, 2017

Opuscula

Perceived slights
Vs. real PC insults

IT’S A FUNNY THING. When someone — anyone — says or writes something critical of either Jews or Israel, the author is instantly labeled Anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, or both, even though the person may be neither.

It’s like an ethnic joke. A Jew can tell a Jewish joke and it’s OK. A black can tell a black joke — even using the “n” word, and it’s ok. Most of us can laugh at ourselves, but woe to the outsider who tells the same story.

By the way, “anti-Semitism” is a misnomer. Arabs also are semites, so the correct term must be “anti-Jewish.” Besides, being politically correct, any combination of Arab or Muslim and terrorist or extremist is unacceptable; ex.-President Obama has spoken and made it so.

At the moment Norway is in the sights of the princes of paranoia.

On one hand, Norwegian Hanne Nabintu Herland, a historian of religion, bestselling author and self-described “social pundit,” accused Norway of being “the most anti-Semitic country in the West” and attacked the government in Oslo for “biased support for only the Palestinian views.” Representing the Norwegian Embassy in Tel Aviv, deputy head of mission Vebjørn Dysvik rejected the claims yet admitted that his government had work to do regarding anti-Jewish sentiment within Norwegian society. He also said that Israel’s occupation of the West Bank and 1978 invasion into Lebanon — which he said was “not Israel’s finest hour” — contributed to a mainly negative view of Israel among ordinary Norwegians. (Source: http://www.timesofisrael.com/at-jerusalem-panel-norwegians-spar-over-israel-and-anti-semitism/)

On the other hand, Norway is demanding that the Palestinian Authority reimburse it for funds donated to a women's center on the West Bank because the center was named after a female militant who participated in an attack in Israel that killed 37 civilians. The women's center was named for Dalal Mughrabi, a member of the Fatah faction of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO.) She participated in the 1978 Coastal Road massacre in Israel and died during the attack.

The Norwegian Foreign Ministry says the country "will not allow itself to be associated with institutions that take the names of terrorists." (Source: http://www.mystatesman.com/news/world/norway-demands-return-funds-from-palestinian-authority/MX80fv8QWeOZUgEmQJXaFK/)

Norway DOES have an anti-Jewish/anti-Israel history; about that there is no question. Norway was the first to require animals to be stunned before slaughtering, a move adopted by its neighbors: Belgium. Denmark, and Switzerland.

Yet, according to Adam Dickter, The production of kosher meat, known as shechita, has long been illegal in Norway, Denmark and Sweden. And in Switzerland, attempts to lift a century-old ban caused an anti-Semitic backlash earlier this year. (Source: http://www.jewishworldreview.com/0702/euro_kosher.asp)

So why the fuss. Nothing new in these four lands.

As an aside, those who want to make an effort can get treif (non-kosher) products in Israel; “white steak” is — or at least was the euphemism for pork “back in the day” — can get most of the forbidden foods prepared in a forbidden way in Israel (which is why an observant Jew or Muslim looks for the certificate of kashrut, even in Israel.)

It’s one thing to attack laws of kosher slaughter. Kosher or not, life at an abattoir is NOT a “pretty thing” and has been known to turn a strong person’s stomach.

One thing that seems to cause confusion is the kosher slaughtering vs. the hallal (Muslim) slaughtering processes. To the best of my limited knowledge, “shecked” animals don’t spend their last seconds wandering around the lot, “silently bleating” (as one anti-hallal observer claimed)

 

How soon unconsciousness?

 

While the subject is human, not animal, if blood flow to the brain stops, "the victim will lose consciousness in about 4 seconds if standing, 8 if sitting, and 12 if lying down. This simply reflects the effects of gravity on blood flow. Another medical truism is that dizziness, loss of consciousness, and sudden death are simply gradations along the same scale. That is, what makes you dizzy can make you lose consciousness, and what makes you lose consciousness can cause death." (Source: https://writersforensicsblog.wordpress.com/2011/07/09/q-and-a-how-long-does-it-take-for-someone-to-die-from-carotid-artery-compression/)

Given the above, a large animal might suffer pain for a few seconds under the knife of a skilled shohet (ritual slaughter). Keep in mind that the animal probably already is anxious and has a high blood pressure, causing a greater immediate blood loss and consequent loss of consciousness.

With stunning as many Europeans demand, or a bullet to the brain -- also acceptable to Europeans and used in the States -- there is no guarantee than (a) the stun will suffice to render the animal senseless and (b) that the bullet will hit its mark.

I often have wondered why no one objects to boiling lobsters alive — doesn’t the crustaceans’ scream bother the diner? — or eating raw (live) oysters. (Source: http://www.businessinsider.com/oysters-are-alive-when-served-2016-6)

Admittedly, banning kosher slaughtering to satisfy both vegans and anti-Jewish passions is without a doubt anti-Jewish and perhaps anti-Israel. But it’s a fact of life. The pity is the anti’s lack tolerance for others; they see what they want to see and wear blinders to all else.

In the end, the joke will be on those who would drive the Jews from their land. A Jewish-free land soon enters an economic decline, not to recover until the Jews return. Look at the Jews’ history in Europe. No Jews – economic woes; Jew, prosperity. As for Norway — just how many sardines can a person eat?

 

 


PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Wednesday, May 24, 2017

Opuscula

Petitions

WE ALL GET THEM — email requests to petition some organization to do something; either support something or banish something.

As a general rule, I delete such emails.

Why?

First, I doubt they do any good. It’s too easy to buy a program that will blast out thousands of emails to a specific destination. No one can take email petitions seriously. Likewise, “copy, sign, and send” letters.

Even Web petitions where a petitioner is required to provide name and email address are easy enough to fake.

That’s not to state there are no good causes; only that email and Web petitions are, in my opinion, a waste of time.

They also tend to get the signer’s name and contact information into someone's mailing list. Thanks, but no thanks.

I also have a problem with petitions that try to remove stuff.

Granted, there is a lot of anti-this and anti-that on the Web.

But as long as the haters stop short of calling for maiming and murder of this or that group, there is a free speech consideration. If I shut down Joe’s free speech, Joe might try to shut down mine.

Besides, better to know your enemy.

It is NOT likely that a well reasoned response will change a hater’s opinion, but if it’s posted along with the hater’s rant, perhaps — just perhaps -- a reader once inclined to agree with the hater will have second thoughts and disavow the hater’s message.

There are many posts on the Web — Facebook, Twitter, and other unfettered social (and anti-social) media — that are offensive to me.

Even “innocent” posts might be found offensive by one or another group. Do they deserve to be shut down simply because what was posted offends me?

Let me be very clear: Calls to commit crimes against people and property SHOULD be removed. Posts calling someone a cretin or besmirching a person’s heritage, while stupid and inappropriate, are still to be tolerated. If the “victim” of the poster is sufficiently offended, he or she can haul the poster into court; libel and slander are civil crimes that can carry a heavy penalty. (What constitutes libel and slander varies by jurisdiction.)

While I might agree with the position of a person asking me to sign a petition against something, if there is a free speech issue involved, I’ll probably forego the petition. On the other hand, if the request to sign a petition is FOR something — more ice cream of Shavuot, for example — than I’d be inclined to add my name.

While I find hater’s deplorable (thank you, Mrs. Clinton), they have — at least in the U.S. — a Constitutional right to express themselves, however poorly and ignorantly.


 

 

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Friday, May 19, 2017

Opuscula

Wedding Plan PR
Ignores audience

ACCORDING TO A BLURB IN The Broward Jewish Journal , a free distribution tabloid, the movie The Wedding Plan — not to be confused with another movie, The Wedding Planner — is a must see.

It might be, but . . .

The flick is playing in south Florida on May 19 — a Friday — and May 20th, Shabat. The newspaper is dated May 17. I happened to be at my barber’s for post-Lag b’Omer cut on the 18th and grabbed a copy of the newspaper on my way out.

The movie’s premise is that the datee (religious) woman’s beau gets cold feet (“I don’t love you”) at the last moment. The hupa, already planned, is — was — to be erected in a short month. (No, the review and trailer failed to mention if the month was a Jewish month on a “regular” month.)

May 19 is a Friday. Obviously, May 20 is Shabat.

I checked online to see where The Wedding Plan was showing.

The theaters showing the film on Friday all had pre-Shabat showings (matinees) as well as at least one showing after the candles are lit. The Shabat day theaters all had motze Shabat showings (as well as during the day).

The Wedding Plan is in Hebrew with English subtitles. It is supposed to be light fare. A movie, in short, that Israeli ex-pats would enjoy.

Granted, many — perhaps most — Israelis-in-America are not shomrei Shabat, but there are many who observe the day. There even are a few American Jews who actually understand Hebrew (vs. reading from a sedur words they don’t comprehend — the plague of the Diaspora).

Most Israeli men, and many women, too, work on Friday. That rules out the matinee showings. Unless everything is already ready for Shabat, most (observant) Jewish women are putting the finishing touches on their Shabat preparations; that rules out the early evening, pre-Shabat showings.

On the flip side, while a heloni might take in the movie on Shabat, there probably are other things already planned. So much for matinee or early evening shows. Besides, if there are children, someone has to find a baby sitter regardless of the level of (Jewish) observance.

The datee won’t be able to get out of the house until after Shabat — locally it ends at about 8:45. There are late showings — one starts after 10p.m. — but it IS late after all. A motze Shabat showing in the winter is “do-able,” but with summer’s long daylight hours . . .

I have no idea WHY the weekly printed the puff piece at the last minute; perhaps the PR just arrived or perhaps, if the reviewer really did see the flick, the reviewer’s invitation came late — either way, the PR was poorly done. (Lousy PR — hasbara in Hebrew — is typical of Israel, even, or perhaps especially, at the government level.*)

Bottom line: While The Wedding Plan may be a great movie and one I would like to see, I’ll have to pass. Now, if it is brought back and shows on a Sunday or weekday (that’s not a holiday), maybe I’ll be able to see it. Israeli comedies usually are excellent – that’s how Israelis in Israel maintain their sanity … at least in my day.

 

 

* For a brief time I flacked (worked in PR) for Tel Aviv University so I have some firsthand knowledge of Israeli PR. I also did PR work in the Several States.

 

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Monday, May 15, 2017

Opuscula

Is Trump about
To renege
On Jerusalem?

PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP has “rethought” — reneged on — several campaign promises and hurried to fulfill one (replacing Obamacare) with a plan that makes Obamacare look good — fortunately wiser heads in the Senate have so far (as this is keyed) prevented the replacement plan’s implementation.

Between POTUS’* changes of heart, the courts, Hillary’s henchmen still hitting the streets in “spontaneous” demonstrations, and “fake news” from biased “reporters” and talking heads, many of the campaign promises are disappearing like smoke in a hurricane.

Now Trump is on his way to kow-tow to America’s Muslim allies, such as Saudi Arabia that had a dirty hand in 9-11 (2001), then to Vatican City to meet the pope, and finally to Israel to meet with its politicians — $5 will get you $10 that the meetings will NOT take place in Jerusalem.

Never mind than an Egyptian president — Anwar al-Sadat — met with the late Menachim Begin in Jerusalem in 1977 and Jordan’s King Hussein met with Netanyahu and David Levy in Jerusalem on March 16, 1997.**

To win the observant Jewish vote (Hillary had the non-observant, leftist Jewish vote in her pocket) Trump repeatedly promised to all who would listen that on his first day in office he would (among other first day promises) order the U.S. embassy moved from Tel Aviv to the Israeli capital, Jerusalem.

Now, slightly more than 100 days into his presidency, he apparently is about to renege on (yet another) campaign promise.

He would not be the first U.S. president to promise to move the embassy to the nation’s capital, nor will he be the first to renege, bowing to the notoriously anti-Israel (and anti-Semitic) U.S. State Department. However, Trump made more of the move than any of his predecessors — or perhaps media coverage was better during the last campaign.

Trump is being told by his pro-Muslim supporters (read State Department) that moving the embassy to Jerusalem would be counter-productive to any “peace” negations between Israel and its enemies in the PA and Gaza.

Nonsense.

First, the location of the embassy NEVER has been an issue, even though president after president has promised to move the embassy to Israel’s capital.

Second, having the embassy in Jerusalem will make it easier for the Arabs in the PA to get visas to come to the U.S.; Jerusalem is closer to the PA area than Tel Aviv — less expensive to access, too.

    If Trump wants to encourage visitors from Gaza and the PA to visit the U.S., let him authorize State to open consulates in Ramallah and Gaza City. Despite “Palestinian” belief, neither the PA nor Gaza is a country.

It’s sad that a candidate who repeatedly made so many promises seems not only unable to keep them but unwilling to keep them.

I would be delighted if this rant proves inaccurate. The next few weeks will tell.


* POTUS: President Of The United States

** I stood on my balcony in Holon and watched as Sadat’s plane, alone in the air, approached the airport. Beautiful sight.


 

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Opuscula

If the links
Are broken,
Blame Google

I WAS REVISITING SOME old blog entries this morning (Tuesday, May 9, 2017) and discovered that the links to other articles — some of them mine, many others’ — were “broken.”

When I checked the copy, I discovered — alas, not for the first time — that Google had “modified” the links.
In the sample below, Google added the red in the text strings.

I HAVE BEEN CREATING HTML-coded copy for a long time. I have done it for commercial clients, I did it for my own web site (now inactive), and I have been doing it on this blog since “Day 1” several years ago.

I know how to code a link to another URL*

Google does other “strange” things to a writer’s works,

On one blog site, the indentation code <UL>/</UL>> works fine. On another blog site, Google ignores the code.

How do I know the code is correct when I upload — “publish” — the copy? I check my coding by saving my word processor file as plain text as <something.html> and opening the file in Google’s Chrome browser.

The URL code - <A HTML=”destination URL” TARGET=”new window”> followed by the linked text, e.g., Laugh-In’s Flying Finger of Fate, and ending with </A> This code has been around since before my well-worn copy of Netscape 2 Unleashed was published in 1996.

Perhaps Google believes I should create my files within its “blogspot” using its limited attribute icons.

Most of the time most of my code seems to work OK. Even multi-cell tables display properly — most of the time.

The easy way to create a table is to use a spread sheet application (e.g., LibreOffice Calc), then add extra columns for HTML code; finally, save the now coded spread sheet as a text (*.txt) file and embed the file into the copy.

I have a love/hate relationship with code. Back in the day — before page composition applications such as FrameMaker, PageMaker, and Ventura learned to “read” word processor codes, I coded my word processor files for the destination application.

I didn’t ENJOY the time-consuming task — shades of WordStar and its pre-< A HTML=”http://justsolve.archiveteam.org/wiki/WordStar#Control_characters” TARGET=”WordStar codes”>WordStar codes>/A>WYSIWYG coding (see http://justsolve.archiveteam.org/wiki/WordStar#Control_characters .


Source: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2013/10/25/internet_archive_historical_software_collection/

I thought the mono screen would bring back memories for my generation.

I wonder — and that’s all I can do — if I was able to FTP** my text to Google if the blog app would let my coding remain the way I intended.

I am not asking Google to let me use some esoteric code, or something that only Firefox can read; all I am asking is that Google stop rewriting my link code. It also would be nice if it was consistent across all blogs — I can indent on one but not the other (ibid.).
Complain to Google? Impossible.

BOTTOM LINE: If the link code FAILS and you read a “Sorry, the page you were looking for in this blog does not exist.” message, RIGHT CLICK on the link, select INSPECT from the pop-up menu, and find the URL in the window to the right.


* URL: Uniform Resource Locator. In the event that the URL is corrupted by Google, the URL is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/URL

** FTP: File Transfer Protocol. In the event the URL is corrupted by Google, the URL is http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/F/ftp.html

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.