Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Free Cell Phones

 

I keep seeing advertisements on the tv telling me that if I meet certain conditions, e.g., welfare, Medicare, I can get a "free" cell phone with more than two hours of nationwide calling.

The cell phones and the minutes are "free" to the people signing up for the free cell phone program. It must be a profitable program for the vendors since there are at least 3 making a pitch on the tube in my area. I doubt these are PSAs (time "donated" by the stations for Public Service Announcements).

Who pays for these "free" cell phones and minutes?

Not the cell phone companies.

The Federal Government pays.

But not really.

We - you, me, all the taxpayers - pay. We pay for the free cell phones, We pay for the free cell phone connectivity. We pay for the Government overhead to administer the free cell phone program. Our government is not known for efficiency or cost effectiveness.

Can anyone explain to me why my taxes are going to pay for free cell phones for people on Medicare, welfare, etc.?

I do NOT object to providing these people with cell phones for 9-1-1 and LOCAL calls (to doctors, schools, etc.) with limited free minutes (e.g., 60 minutes/month) ,

I DO object - and object strongly - to paying for free cell phones and for more than two hours for "free" nationwide calling.

I work to pay my cell phone bill (and all the applicable taxes), and I pay a fairly high rate for my plan. I am on Medicare and soon will be on Social Security. I am NOT asking for a taxpayer-paid (certainly not "free") cell phone with two hours or more nationwide minutes.

Again, to be clear, I do NOT begrudge an indigent or near indigent a free cell phone for 9-1-1 calls or even limited minutes for local calls, but I do resent the government taking my money via a Washington fiat to fund more than two hours of free cell phone nationwide minutes.

Our government is picking our pockets. Can we afford to let this continue?

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Minhagai Sukot מנחגי סוכות

>p> 

The following are minhagim for Sukot for Sefardim from North Africa. They often are at odds with both Ashkenazi minhagim and those of R. Ovadia Yosef for Mizrahim.

All minhagim within the framework of halakah (Jewish law) are valid and should be respected. In general, a Jew visiting a congregation with a minhag different from the visitors should follow the local customs.

The minhagim are excerpted from the following books:

(דברי שלןם יאמת (דשו"א
ילקוט שמ"ש (י"ש) של ר' שלום משאש
הוג יןסך חי (הי"ח) של ר' יוסף משאש

Kiddish/L'Shev b'Sukah; On Yom Tov and Shabat, when the (evening) kiddish is recited standing, the blessing to sit in the sukah also is said standing. On the intermediate days when there is no kiddish, L'Shev b'Sukah is said sitting immediately after Motze Lehem and before tasting the bread. (י"ש)

Anyone who eats only couscous or rice - in lieu of bread - does not recite the L'Shev b'Sukah blessing. (הי"ח)

Natelat Lulav (waving/shaking) the lulav). The tradition in Maknes is that of the Ari Zal and is as follows:
south north, east, while facing east up, down, west (הי"ח)

Otherwise, the tradition is:
south, north, east, while facing east up, down, west

The person holding the etrog and lulav turns in each direction (unlike most Ashkenazim who stand in one direction and shake over their head and shoulders). (י"ש)

Hakafot with Torah on bemah: On all days of Sukot a sefer Torah is placed on the bemah and then we go once around the bemah (except on Hoshana Raba when we go around seven times.

Hakafot without lulav: There is an ancient minhag that even a person sans lulav may join in the hakafot (walking around the amud/bemah). The Rem'a rules otherwise for Ashkenazim. (י"ש)

Hosheanote on Shabat: The North African minhag is to say Hosheanote on Shabat, but because of Shabat, we do not do hakafot. (דשו"א)

While North African (from Morocco to Libya) customs may be different from others' customs, the "bottom line" is that all minhagim within the framework of halakah (Jewish law) are valid and should be respected.

Hag samach חג שמח

NOTE: I am not a rabbi and I do not play one on tv.

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Headline vs. story

 

Publication Date 08/30/2010
Source: Lawyers USA http://tinyurl.com/32lphse

Job applicant with dreadlocks can't get damages, says 7th Circuit [Lawyers USA]

A Rastafarian who claimed he didn't get a job because of his dreadlocks can't recover damages for religious discrimination, the 7th Circuit has ruled in affirming judgment.

The plaintiff wears his hair in dreadlocks in accordance with the tenets of his religion. He sued for religious discrimination under Title VII after the defendant allegedly refused to hire him because he wouldn't agree to cut his hair in conformity with the company's grooming policy.

The court decided that the defendant could not be held liable because the plaintiff never brought his religious beliefs to the employer's attention during the interview process.

The court explained that this conclusion was not altered by the plaintiff's allegation that he told the job interviewer that it was against his "belief" to cut his hair.

"[The plaintiff] claims that his use of the word 'belief' and the dreadlocks themselves sufficed to notify [the interviewer] of the religious nature of his hairstyle. But unlike race or sex, a person's religion is not always readily apparent. ...

"[The interviewer] testified that he was not familiar with the Rastafarian faith and did not associate [the plaintiff's] statement of 'belief' with religion. The district court concluded that [the interviewer] did not know that [the plaintiff] wore his dreadlocks for religious reasons, and that finding is not clearly erroneous," the court said.

U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit. Xodus v. Wackenhut Corp., No. 09-3082. Aug. 27, 2010. Lawyers USA No. 993-2228.

(c) 2010 ProQuest Information and Learning Company; All Rights Reserved

What's this mean for kippa-wearing Jews?

Don't expect all potential employers to understand the kippa is "proper apparel" for Jewish males - if there is a question or challenge, explain that it is a Jewish religious thing (and expect a push-back because "We have lots of Jews here and THEY don't wear those things work").

Of course the kippa is a relatively new tradition we adapted from one of the peoples that controlled Israel at one time or another. The story is that these people covered their heads as a sign of respect for their rulers. In typical Jewish mentality, we thought: Gee, if they cover their heads for an earthly king, how much more important is it for use to cover our hears in the presence of THE King.

For a similar reason, old-line Moroccan Jews still don't cross their legs during prayers. In Morocco, it was considered an insult to a judge if people in the courtroom crossed their legs; if it's an insult to a human judge, how much more to THE Judge.

Yohanon Glenn
Yohanon.Glenn at gmail dot com

Thursday, September 2, 2010

Peace - generations away

 

The US War for Southern Independence, a/k/a War of Northern Aggression or Civil War was fought from 1861 to 1865.

Following the war, the prevailing US government tightly controlled governments of the rebellious states for another 12 years, to 1877.

I've lived in a neutral, "bipolar" state (Indiana) that sent troops to both Federal and Confederate armies and allowed both to ride the state's railroad as long as they could buy a ticket and kept the peace.

I've lived in the south - Alabama, Florida, and Texas.

And I've lived in the Intermountain West.

Believe me when I relate that there are some folks in the "real" south - rural Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, the Carolinas and Texas, and maybe a few in Kentucky and Tennessee, who firmly believe Damn Yankee is one word - damnyankee.

These are not necessarily Ku Kluxers and they are not necessarily racist, although probably many are the latter. Mostly they ae "states' righters," people who believe the less Federal interference in state-level issues the better.

The only time these folks gave rest to their ill-will toward the Federal powers was when the nation went to war - World Wars 1 and 2, Korea, Vietnam.

Only now, more than a century and a half after the end of hostilities and 133 years after the so-called reconstruction period ended are the hand-me-down hatreds of a defeated people beginning to be forgotten, let go.

A neighbor of mine who had been in World War 2 in the Pacific refused to buy a Japanese car for most of his adult life. I felt the same way about "Made in Germany" - regardless of the politically correct reparations paid to the few surviving Jews and others deemed unfit to live by the nazis. My neighbor and I both came to realize that the way cars are built today, parts come from all parts of the world, including Germany and Japan. As it happens, I drive a Korean made-from-Japanese-specifications car "assembled" in the U.S.

The point of all the above is to warn people not to expect "instant peace" no matter what transpires between Israel and the Moslem power-du-jour in Occupied Israel.

I am amazed, and grateful, that a relative peace exists on Israel's borders with Egypt and Jordan; I consider Egypt's Muhammad Anwar El Sadat, whose plane I watched from my Holon balcony as it headed to Lod, a true hero. Jordan's King Hussein bin Talal was brave, but only followed Sadat's lead.

But even with the peace, there still is a great deal of mistrust. I hear - less and less in Israel - that "you don't trust an Arab even when he's in the ground." This from people who were born in Arab states, people who "know" the Arab/Moslem mentality.

However, when you see photos such as this one, where the slaughter of innocents is indoctrinated into very small children; where martyrdom is glorified before kindergarten boys and girls, you must realize that until this generation - the children of today - dies and the indoctrination stops, suicide murders, rocket attacks, and other outrages on Israeli citizens - Jews and non- Jews - will continue.

No "magic words" from world leaders will change the mindset of Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Quida, and the hundred other Islamic terror organizations that threaten both Israel and the rest of the world as well.

The politicians might shake hands and win "Peace" prizes that, based on recent past recipients have no real value, but the people, the children, will continue to learn not war but murder. It is not war to load a donkey with explosives and walk it into a crowd to blow up the animal and the people around it. It is not war to strap explosives on children and pregnant women and send them to blow themselves up "for Allah."

There are, of course, two sides to every coin. The people of Gaza will not welcome intercourse with Israelis with open arms, remembering not that they were used as shields by their brothers but that the Israelis had the gall, the chutzpah, to defend themselves by returning fire.

The Arabs in Occupied Israel also won't be happy with Israelis who built a fence that inconveniences them just because terrorists came into Israel from their territory.

The Lebanese will long remember Israel's incursion while forgetting why.

Eventually, most of the hatred will go away, but Hamas, Hezbollah, et al, are doing everything they can to assure it will linger long into the future.

I would like to think my grand-daughter will live in peace in Israel and that she can travel freely as her neighbors from the Arab states. I know it won't happen in my lifetime, but God willing, perhaps in hers.

Yohanon Glenn
Yohanon.Glenn at gmail dot com