Showing posts with label UN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UN. Show all posts

Friday, October 14, 2016

Opuscula

UNESCO:
Blind In one Eye
Can’t see from other

IS IT STUPIDITY OR FEAR that caused 31 nations to deny any historical Jewish presence in Israel’s capital.

The 31 nations passed a resolution acknowledging only Islamic history of the Temple Mount – referring to the site only as “Al-Ḥaram Al-Sharif” and ignoring any Jewish history at the sacred site.

In all, there were five Israel-related items on the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) agenda: Muslims prevailed in all five.

This DESPITE archeological proof that Jews were on the mount centuries before Muhammad arrived on the scene. This despite literary evidence that the Temple was on the mount centuries before Muhammad arrived on the scene.

Don’t take the Jews’ word for it – check it out in Rome where Titus’ arch still depicts Roman soldiers carrying off the Temple menorah.

Discount if you will all the writings as “sepur savta” – grandmother’s stories – disregard the unchallenged life in Babylon where Jews wrote “if I forget thee o’Jerusalem.” If the Jews never were in Jerusalem, why cry over the loss of the city? (Even then, some Jews remained in Jerusalem. It NEVER has been completely free of Jews; not when the Babylonians ruled, not when the Romans ruled, not even when the Moslems ruled. Even under Jordanian control – when Jews had few freedoms – Jews still lived in their holy city.)

In July 2011, USA Today headlined Ancient bell found in Jerusalem Old City sewer and reported that A tiny golden bell pulled after 2,000 years from an ancient sewer beneath the Old City of Jerusalem was unveiled Sunday by Israeli archaeologists, who hailed it as a rare find.

The orb half an inch in diameter has a small loop that appears to have been used to sew it as an ornament onto the clothes of a wealthy resident of the city two millennia ago, archaeologists said.

HaAretz, an Israeli newspaper and propagandist for the Palestinian Authority, headlined on Oct. 21, 2015 Were There Jewish Temples on Temple Mount? Yes has as its lead paragraph The preponderance of archaeological and historical evidence is overwhelming and the argument that there is 'no proof' of the Temples is a modern political artifact.

The Wall Street Journal reported under the headline A Boy’s Discovery Rebuts Temple Mount Revisionism that while "Palestinians deny Jewish roots at the holy site, a newly unearthed artifact confirms historical truths."

An unidentified writer for Palestine Facts notes that In 715 AD, Prophet Muhammad SAW made a journey to Heaven from the Dome of Rock, the site built by Caliph Abd al-Malik in 687 AD. Muslims all over the world could now associate with the place even more and al-Aqsa Mosque was built on the same site. Based on this, Jerusalem became the third most sacred city for Muslims after Makkah and Medina. Dropping the Roman name, it was given a Muslim name ‘Bait al-Muqaddas’ in line with al-Bait al-Haram in Makkah.

No one denies the Muslim presence in Jerusalem. The Temple was allowed – rightly or wrongly - by the Israeli government to remain under Muslim control after the city was returned to the Jewish state. Allowing the Muslims to control the Temple mount never denied that the first and second Temples were Jewish or suggested anything other than the Muslims were late arriving, even after non-Jews had control of the city.

But UNESCO, blind to reality, denies the history of the site, proving that the organization belies its name: the United Nations Educational (no), Scientific (no) and Cultural (no) Organization.


THE RESOLUTIONS

According to Middle East Resolutions: Detailed Voting Results on UNESCO’s web site were as follows:

The first item that came up for a vote was Item 5, Implementation of 35 C/Resolution 49 and 184 EX/Decision 5 (IV) relating to the Ascent to the Mughrabi Gate in the Old City of Jerusalem. The roll call vote was 31 voting for the resolution (against Israel), 5 against (in support of Israel), and 17 abstentions. The five votes supporting Israel on this item were from Germany, Denmark, USA, Italy, and Slovakia.

The second item was item 14, Jerusalem and the Implementation of 35 C/Resolution 49 and 184 EX/Decision 12. The roll call vote was 34 voting for the resolution (against Israel); 1 against (USA), and 19 abstentions.

The third item was item 15, Implementation of 184 EX/Decision 37 on “the two Palestinian sites of al- Haram al-Ibrahimi/Tomb of the Patriarchs in al-Khalil/Hebron and the Bilal bin Rabah Mosque/Rachel’s Tomb in Bethlehem”. The roll call vote was 44 voting for the resolution (against Israel), 1 against (USA), and 12 abstentions.

The fourth item was item 36, Implementation of 35 C/Resolution 75 and 184 EX/Decision 30 concerning educational and cultural institutions in the occupied Arab territories. The roll call vote was 41 voting for the resolution (against Israel), 1 against (USA), and 15 abstentions.

The final item was item 37, Report by the Director-General on the reconstruction and development of Gaza; Implementation of 184 EX/Decision 31. The roll call vote was 41 voting for the resolution (against Israel), 1 against (USA), with 15 abstentions.


Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Send ill, bills to Israel



 

From the Palestinian news agency, Ma’an on Published Monday 15/07/2013 (updated) 17/07/2013

Private hospitals stop treating Palestinian military personnel

Published Monday 15/07/2013 (updated) 17/07/2013 13:54

>

  NABLUS - Monday 15/07/2013 (updated) 17/07/2013- (Ma'an) -- Palestinian private hospitals on Monday stopped admitting Palestinian Authority military personnel because of the government's outstanding bills. ( http://www.maannews.net/eng/ViewDetails.aspx?ID=614104&utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter )

  The federation of private hospitals decided to start refusing treatment to patients referred by the PA's military medical services because their debt to hospitals reached 30 million shekels ($8.34 million), federation chief Dr Nitham Nijab said.



  Several hospitals announced that they could no longer afford to amass more debt, Najib told Ma'an, adding that some hospitals had not paid their employees for several months.

  Other hospitals have had to borrow from banks to meet their basic expenses, and suppliers have threatened to stop providing medicine and equipment, Nijab added.

  The PA's military medical services promised to transfer 10 million shekels ($2.87 million) and 150,000 Jordanian dinars ($212,000) to the federation of private hospitals several months ago but the money was not delivered, Nijab said.

  On Tuesday, a network of fuel distributors announced that gas stations would stop letting the PA security forces fill up for free after the PA's finance ministry failed to pay their bills for five months.

Which means that the EU and UN will shortly blame Israel for withholding

  • Funds
  • Gasoline
  • Medical supplies
and demand that Israeli hospitals treat (more) PA-resident patients at the already hard-pressed Israeli taxpayers’ expense.

Part of the PA’s financial woes can be laid directly at the doors of its Arab League financiers who promise millions but barely deliver thousands.

Additional PA financial hardship will burden PA residents when the EU labels, and boycotts, goods made in Shimron by Israeli companies that employ PA residents. If the companies cannot sell their wares, they will lay off workers and then close their doors.

Maybe the reason the PA’s terrorist leader, Abu Mazen, won’t talk with Israeli leaders is he can’t afford the gas to drive from Ramallah to Jerusalem! Since he wants the PA to be Jew-free, Israeli leaders should stay out of his assigned territory.

Hopefully, the day will come when the PA’s U.S. equipped “police” will be unable to buy bullets and bombs to use against Israelis.

If the PA goes into bankruptcy, will Jordan absorb it? Jordan was, and remains, THE true Palestinian state. Will it take Aza, too. (Please.)

Friday, June 7, 2013

When the going gets tough The Blue Bonnets get going


 

UN "peacekeeper" withdrawal
starts, Austrians pack up tents

 

According to Israel HaYom, the Austria's are turning tail and pulling out of Syria where they were charged with maintaining a buffer zone between the Syrians and Israel. (http://tinyurl.com/lv5zryp)

"Danger to Austrian soldiers has risen to an unacceptable level," says its chancellor.

This is not the first time the Blue Bonnets have abandoned their mission. (On May 16, 1967 Nasser ordered a withdrawal of the United Nations Emergency Forces (UNEF) stationed on the Egyptian-Israeli border, thus removing the international buffer between Egypt and Israel which had existed since 1957. http://tinyurl.com/ks22dfg )

According to the Jewish Press, Israel Minister of Strategic and Intelligence Affairs Yuval Steinintz (Likud) said that the lesson is very clear, “In any peace agreement, Israel cannot rely on international forces, but only on IDF soldiers.” He added that South Lebanon, under the UN’s watch, now has 40,000 missiles embedded there pointed at Israel. The UN did nothing to stop it. (http://tinyurl.com/l46hu2g )




UNDOF Peacekeepers on the Golan (UN Photo)

Meanwhile, as the Austrians get ready to retreat to increasingly Muslim Europe, the Philippines said today (7 Jun 2013) it still was studying whether to pull its UN peacekeeping force out of the Golan Heights, after the wounding of a Filipino soldier and the withdrawal of Austrian troops there. (http://tinyurl.com/mtmn9my )

Japan and Croatia already pulled out. Fiji has promised some replacement troops but they have not yet arrived. (http://tinyurl.com/jvlavsk )

India also has troops serving in the UN Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF), which has monitored a ceasefire between Israel and Syria since 1974. So far, there has been no reports of an Indian departure. (ibid.)

Granted, the Blue Bonnets were supposed to maintain the ceasefire between Syria and Israel, and as long as Assad was in total control, the border was less or more quiet. Now that his control is shared by rebels and Hamas and with terrorists (Hezbollah) Syria's internal war - hardly a "civil war" since there are many non-Syrians involved) - is spilling over Israeli, Turkish, and Jordanian borders. Lebanon has been a Syrian outpost for years and no longer counts as an independent nation.

It IS interesting to note that (apparently) there are NO Arab League nations involved in trying to stem the Sunni-Shiite war within Syria's borders.

According to The Arab League Web presence (http://tinyurl.com/7hfjwqz ), "The Arab League comprises of 22 members. The members are Jordan, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Tunisia, Algeria, Djibouti, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Somalia, Iraq, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Comoros, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Egypt, Morocco, Mauritiana and Yemen. The League is involved in political, economic, cultural and social programs to promote the interests of the member states. It has successfully settled some Arab disputes. It played a crucial role in limiting conflicts like the Lebanese civil war of 1958."

One has to wonder about the League's ability at "limiting conflicts" giving the conditions of several of its member states (currently including Algeria, Egypt, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Somalia, Sudan, and Tunisia).

Jordan, abutting Syria, wisely is keeping its troops at home as it faces discontent of its own. Turkey, not yet a League member state, also has reason to keep its troops within its borders as the natives become restless.

Given the number of so-called Palestinians in Syria and the fact that the Palestinian Authority is armed by the U.S., one has to wonder why Mahmoud Abbas, a/k/a terrorist Abu Mazen, doesn't send his troops into Syria to either (a) separate the warring factions or (b) extricate the "Palestinians" from the field of battle. "Palestine" is, after all, a League member.

Perhaps Obama and John McCain will decide the U.S. should send troops into Syria - but on whose side? - since, as Obama claims, the war in Afghanistan is winding down and what can he do with all these troops except send them into yet another winless war for a people who loath Americans. (Who said the Dems and GOP couldn't agree on anything.)

Maybe the Austrians are right after all. If the Muslims of the Arab League are afraid to enter the fray, why should the Austrians? Why should the UN (Useless Nobodies) hang around.

If the "rebels" gain control, Israel can expect to be attacked.

If Assad survives Israel will be forced to eliminate the Russian missiles due in 2014 while preventing any more weapons transfer to Hezbollah.

For Israel, it is a lose-lose situation, but at least Israel's politicians have - so far - had sufficient intelligence to stay out of Syria's internal war.