Showing posts with label Shamai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Shamai. Show all posts

Sunday, April 14, 2019

Opuscula

Be the first
To offer
A greeting

I READING A Code of Jewish Ethics Vol. 1 by Jos. Telushkin. I’ve had the book for some time and I probably opened it once or twice before.

This time I am reading it.

One thing that caught my eye relates to two of my favorite Jewish personalities: Yohanon (bar Nappacha, brother-in-law to Shimon ben Lekish a/k/a Resh Lakish) and Shamai.

Yohanon made a point, according to the book, of being the first to greet everyone, even non-Jews.

Shamai said to greet everyone with a pleasant disposition.

Rambam (Moses Ben Maimon, a/k/a Maimonides) said that “A scholar should greet all men before they greet him so that the spirits of others derive pleasure from him.

While I would not presume to be a Yohanon of the famous Yohanon of the talmud, we do share two things: the name Yohanon, and the desire to be the first to greet others.

Similar to Shamai, I try to greet others with a pleasant demeanor.

(Anyone who “puts down” Bet Shamai really doesn’t know about Shamai. In many respects he was more liberal, especially when it came to rulings dealing with women, than Hillel the Elder. Hillel’s reputation largely is based on one incident when a man came to Shamai and Hillel demanding to be taught everything about Judaism while he stood on one foot. Shamai chased the man way; Hillel told him one thing and said “the rest is commentary, go study.” Did the man “go study”? There is no evidence either way.)

Greeters must consider the person they are greeting.

This morning, Shabat, on the way back from minyan, I met a non-observant Jewish neighbor working on his car.

Pesach is next Shabat.

I greeted the man with “Are you ready for the holiday?” I didn’t ask if he was done cleaning for Pesach or did he sell his hametz. He told me he is going to visit family in another state for Passover.

Even if his house is not “K4P,” he is aware of the holiday and intends to spend it with family. The point of the matza and hagadah is to remember the exodus from Egypt and what led up to it. The Torah tells us not to have anything leavened in our possession, but the rabbis allow us to pretend to sell hametz while keeping possession of it.

Strictly speaking . . .

 

On the way to the minyan I met the neighbor across the street from the Jewish guy. The neighbor is not Jewish. With him we discussed neighborly things and his upcoming knee replacement surgery.

A third neighbor, an observant Jew, passed by with a Shabat shalom greeting as he made his way to a different minyan. (Where I live there is no shortage of minyanim, all within easy walking distance for the able bodied and a few within walking distance for geezers such as this scrivener.) This neighbor “beat me to the punch” by sneaking up behind me; had I seen him first . . .

I do not try to greet everyone downtown or even in the supermarket, although I do speak to many. I nod to strangers who make eye contact. Unfortunately, the current state of affairs makes many people suspicious of strangers who greet them; they respond like the Tar Baby in an Uncle Remus Br’r Rabbit story. (I do not respond as Br’r Rabbit responded.)

By the way, I don’t see that Uncle Remus stories are racist. On the contrary, I think it acknowledges the positive role some blacks had in developing ethics in children, regardless of the amount of melanin in their skin.)

Still, in my neighborhood, I try to be the first with a greeting.

I tried to instill that attitude in my children. (My spouse thinks I’m nuts.)

I’m glad I decided to read Telushkin’s book (one of many), finding out my habit is endorsed by some Big Names (Shamai, Yohanon, Rambam), I’m definitely in good company.

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

עינים להם ולא יראו * אזנים להם ולא יאזנו

Comments on Greetings


Sunday, June 9, 2013

What's the big deal?

 

Women and their place

 

Understand this scrivener stands with Bet Shamai on most issues, see http://yohanon.blogspot.com/2011/09/shamai-that-you-never-knew.html.

If you never learned more about Shamai than the few words in Pirke Avot (פרקי אבות) - in which he is horribly given short shrift in comparison to his peer, Hillel, than "you don't know Shamai."

One of the current "tempests in a teapot" in Israel is "Women of the Wall," or "WoW" for short to appease hed (headline) writers.

As I understand it, these women go, monthly on Rosh Hodesh, to pray at the kotel, the Western Wall where the second Temple once stood - and where the abomination al-Aqsa now stands. Again, it is my understanding that they stand on the women's side of the mehitzah (מחיצה).

So far, no problem.

Trouble is, some of these women insist on a wearing tallit , and others both tallit and tefillin.

This troubles the haredim.

Women are not allowed these accouterments. They are the sole purview of males, and males older than 13 years and a day. The rabbis said so. Tallit and tefillin are "men's wear" and therefore, according to Torah (תורה שבעל-פי), forbidden.

The question, of course, is "when" did tallit and tefillin become strictly "men's ware?"

We are given to understand that (at least) one of Rabbi Shlomo Yitzhaki's 3 daughters wore tallit and tefillin. Rabbi Shlomo is better known as Rashi. (According to a Wikipedia entry at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rashi, "While some women in medieval Ashkenaz did wear tefillin, there is no evidence that Rashi's daughters did so.")

Of course, it must be admitted that Rashi's grandson, Rabbi Yakov ben Meir Tam, contested many of his grandfather's decisions; to this day, Ashkenazim and some Sefardim/Mizrachim attach mezzuzot at a slant ( \  ) to satisfy both Rashi, who stayed with the tradition of his time and fixed the mezzuzot upright ( | ) and Tam who wanted the mezzuzot horizontal (  - ). Many men - both Ashkenazi and Sefardi/Mizrachi - don two sets of tefillin, sometimes at once, to meet both the traditional/Rashi order of klaf and to meet Tam's revised order. (See http://ott.co.il/tefillin/tefillin-of-rashi-and-rabbeinu-tam/ for an explanation of the differences.)

In my mixed congregation - we have people following Egyptian, Moroccan, Syrian, and Turkish traditions (minhagim) - we have several Ashkenazi bachelors. None of there people wear a tallit except when they have a Torah honor. This begs the question: Is the tallit required at all? Among Sefardim and most Mizrachim, boys start donning a full (albeit boy-) size tallit early on; exactly when varies by minhag.

AN ASIDE: My wife - a Moroccan - likes the idea of unmarried men praying sans tallit; she also likes to see unmarried women sans hair covering. To her, this advertises who is "eligible" and who is not. Are all women match-makers at heart?

Shabat Rosh Hodesh Tamuz (Shabat Korah) 5773 saw the WoWs at the wall along with other observant women. There were no reports of conflicts among the women.

The haredi men, on the other hand - and I make a distinction between "haredi" and "observant" Jews - once again came to harass the women . . . women on their OWN SIDE OF THE FENCE. That smacks of hutzpa and it also tells me the men only insist on the mehitzah (מחיצה) when it suits them.

Unfortunately, the haredi men seem to think they ARE Israel and only what they want must be followed; they have become the ayatollahs of Israel. In the process, both at the Wall and elsewhere throughout Israel, these men are alienating "regular" Jews - observant and heloni (non-observant) to the point that the haredim are beginning to be held in contempt, and with them, the institutions they control.

Rather than arrange a marriage via the local rabbinute, Israeli Jews (continue) to marry outside of Israel or marry in a civil ceremony in Israel. It is not a matter of marrying a person with "questionable" Jewish bona fides, it's a matter of how the people applying for the rabbinical "stamp of approval" are received. In short, many are received in a manner foreign to Shamai as he is quoted in Avoth. For the record, I am fully in favor of proving Jewishness of both partners before a wedding. I don't care how each partner became Jewish - "accident of birth" or kosher-by-Rambam conversion - just that both are Jewish.

Personally, I do NOT like to see women in tallit and tefillin. I can't find anything that prohibits a woman wearing these accouterments, but being a "traditionalist" I simply am "uncomfortable" around women thusly appointed.

The reason women are exempt - critical word, "exempt" vs. "forbidden" - from tallit and tefillin is because both are "time sensitive"; that is, the related mitzvah must be performed after and before certain (proportional) hours. The rabbis of old, in their wisdom, believed that a woman with a baby cannot be expected to put down the infant or ignore a child while she is wearing tallit and tefillin, so they exempted women from such "time sensitive" mitzvoth. Makes sense to me.

My suggestion to the haredi - ignore the WoW. They won't "go away," but you won't get an ulcer and you might even find non-haredi start to appreciate you and your convictions. They still might not agree with you, but at least some sinat henam can be avoided.

Comments in English or Hebrew to: Yohanon dot Glenn at gmail dot com