Showing posts with label Oslo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oslo. Show all posts

Monday, October 22, 2018

Opuscula

Yitzhak Rabin
Remembered

THE OTHER DAY IN ISRAEL there was the annual “Remember Yitzhak Rabin” Day.
It remembers the State’s shame of having a former prime minister slain.

But it also eulogizes a man whose past is bloody.

I REMEMBER YITZHAK RABIN as the man who ordered Ben Gurion’s Haganah to open fire on fellow Jews bringing personnel and weapons to fight for Israel’s survival. Rabin was the “on the shore” commander pledged to do what his self-important boss told him. Ben Gurion hated – and that is not too strong a word – Menachem Begin, a leader of Lehi and political foe of Ben Gurion.

Lest anyone forget, Ben Gurion ordered Rabin to take troops to the shore and to confiscate all weapons Begin’s people had acquired in Europe. Begin had agreed to share the weapons with Ben Gurion’s Haganah. The boat was the Altalena1.


Image from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altalena_Affair

Then there was Oslo, a one-sided agreement with Yassar Arafat. Israel lost, the PLO gained – and never, to this day, has the PLO lived up to the agreement.

Meanwhile, Rabin received the Nobel Peace Prize along with his own Minister of Foreign Affairs Shimon Peres and the PLO’s leader Yasser Arafat.

It was the agreement that caused Rabin’s assassination by Yigal Amir, a Jewish Israeli student in 1995 in Tel Aviv.

On the positive side, Israel now has peace agreements with former enemies Jordan and Egypt.

Did Rabin arrange the peace agreement with Egypt?

No, it was Began – vilified by Rabin’s mentor Ben Gurion, and Anwar Sadat.

Rabin was Prime Minister at the signing of the Israel-Jordan agreement.2

Assassinating political leaders is all to common around the world, and more than a few were murdered in ancient Israel. However, killing a prime minster in Israel was a shock and brought shame to the country, no matter what justification Amir believed he had for the murder.

At the most recent Rabin memorial event, his relatives broke with the tradition of trying to heal differences and excoriated members of the current government.

In other words, they behaved like American leftists after losing an election.

According to the Jerusalem Post3,
Slain prime minister Yitzhak Rabin’s grandchildren blasted Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during services marking the 23rd anniversary of Rabin’s assassination on Sunday, in one case falsely accusing Netanyahu’s spokesperson of a tweet referring to Rabin as a traitor. 

Noa Rotman, speaking at a ceremony on Mount Herzl, harshly criticized the country’s political leadership and said that people in positions of authority were taking part in incitement.

“If you don’t stop the journey of incitement, blood will be spilled here,” she said, as Netanyahu sat in the front row alongside President Reuven Rivlin.

At the Knesset two hours later, Netanyahu referenced Rotman’s statement, and said he was “astonished” by the accusation, and that it was completely baseless. The tweet in question was posted by Caroline Glick of a satirical poster before Yom Kippur showing pictures of various left-wing figures and organizations under terms used in the traditional confession Jews say on Yom Kippur. 

Over a picture of Rabin shaking Yasser Arafat’s hands on the White House lawn was the caption, “we sinned.”  

“I was shocked, because I did not believe for a minute that someone in the Prime Minister’s Office did such a thing,” Netanyahu said. “But I immediately asked to look into it – and it turned out that it really did not exist. This is a tweet from a journalist who has nothing to do with the Prime Minister’s Office.”

Sounds a great deal like the Democrats claims about the U.S. president.

The Times of Israel4 reports that
Yonatan Ben-Artzi, Rabin’s grandson, used his speech on the Hebrew anniversary of the murder to attack Netanyahu for dividing the country, arguing it would lead to Israel’s destruction.

“A leadership that encourages division and violent attacks on other opinions. He who drives and incites against anyone who thinks differently from him as a sourpuss or a leftist will lead to the destruction of the next Temple,” charged Ben-Artzi.

“The citizens of the state are entitled to a leadership that cares for their needs and is not bored with them and their requirements,” he said. “A leadership that mocks and disparages those that feel distress is the source of that evil, and it will deepen the rift, division and internal conflict.”

That is reminiscent of the Israeli Labor party politician who told an American woman who dared raise an issue to “Go back to America.”

The Rabin memorial event has, in the past, been nothing less than a paean to the slain former leader; it was not, until this year, used as a bully pulpit to castigate political opponents.

The only thing the Rabin descendants have accomplished by their vitriol is to send people to their history sources to learn about Rabin before he became a murdered “hero.”

The Altalena proved that both Ben Gurion and Rabin had feet of clay.

Rabin’s memorial should be noted as a moment in modern Israel’s history when the rule of law was superseded by a religious zealot.


Sources

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Altalena_Affair

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israel%E2%80%93Jordan_peace_treaty#History

3. http://tinyurl.com/ybqoonno

4. http://tinyurl.com/yat259t7

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on Rabin

Monday, January 8, 2018

Opuscula

Almost everything
Upsets Palestinians
But Israel’s demise

RECENTLY THE SO-CALLED “PALESTINIANS” hit the streets to main and kill because U.S. President Trump recognized Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. a fact on the ground since 1967.

Now, President Trump is cutting the UN’s special fund for “Palestinian” welfare by freezing the US$125 million January dole payment.

It is interesting to note that the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees is the ONLY UN agency of its type – no other body of “displaced” peoples has a UN agency dedicated to it.

Who is against the cut?

Israel’s near-sighted and often two-faced prime minister1

ACCORDING TO THE ENGLISH online edition of Israel HaYom (Israel Today) for Monday, 8 January, Netanyahu voiced support for Trump's threat to cut aid to the Palestinians, saying the UNRWA "perpetuates the Palestinian refugee problem and the right of return narrative, in an effort to eliminate the State of Israel."

"Therefore, UNRWA should pass from the world," Netanyahu declared.

However

While Netanyahu praised Trump's "critical approach" to the aid issue, he steered clear of advocating a suspension of funding for the Palestinians, reflecting concern that cutting off funds could exacerbate Palestinian hardship and put Israel on a collision course with Palestinian terrorist groups.

He said UN. aid funds should be transferred to Gaza gradually via its global refugee agency, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, "with clear criteria for supporting genuine refugees and not fictitious ones, as is happening today under UNRWA."

UNRWA spokesman Chris Gunness said the refugee crisis was being perpetuated by "failure of the parties to deal with the issue. UNRWA is mandated by the General Assembly to continue with its services until a just and lasting solution is found for the Palestine refugees.

The fact that many of the grandparents of today's “refugees” left Israel in 1948 because the mufti in Amman told them to get out of the way of the glorious Arab armies who would drive the Jews to the sea.2

Why is Netanyahu cowering? Attacks by “Palestinian” terrorists?

When have these people STOPPED attacking Israelis – women, children, old people, and soldiers.

The “Palestinian” – and Gazan – leaders, instead of sending their kin on jihad to become shahidem (martyrs) sends their kin to Israeli – not Egyptian, not Jordanian, not European, but Israeli – hospitals. “Palestinians” regularly travel to Arab states and Europe via Israel’s air and sea ports.

Meanwhile, The United Nation's International Children's Fund is spearheading a campaign to include the Israel Defense Forces on a UN. blacklist of "grave violators of children's rights," that includes terrorist groups like the Islamic State group and Boko Haram, this according to a new report by the NGO Monitor watchdog group.3

The NGO Monitor report further shows how UNICEF opted to ignore violations of children's rights by Palestinian organizations in the Gaza Strip, when it admitted "the working group was not in a position to document cases of child recruitment and use of children in armed conflict owing to a number of factors, including security and protection risks related to collecting comprehensive and detailed information."

A number of these organizations, including the Defense for Children International- Palestine, have ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, which has been recognized as a terrorist organization by Israel, Canada, the EU and the U.S.

The liberal media and leftists governments around the world are complaining that Trump’s recognition of reality will destroy any “peace talks” between Israel and the “Palestinians.”

The question is: WHAT PEACE TALKS?

The “Palestinians” have not sat down with Israelis for serious, no pre-condition peace talks for months. Recognition of Jerusalem cannot be blamed for holding up peace negotiations months before Trump’s announcement. (When the “Palestinians” and Israelis came to an agreement in Oslo, the “Palestinians” quickly broke the agreement.)

Having the “Palestinians” sit down with Israelis is similar to Democrats sitting down with Trump and the Republican leadership. Even though the Democrat leadership failed to show, they still blame the GOP and Trump for lack of cooperation. (Did they learn from the “Palestinians”?)



Sources

1. Israel HaYom: http://tinyurl.com/y8okrac2

2. Arab exodus: http://tinyurl.com/y96n6v9j

3. UNICEF: http://tinyurl.com/y8wg5lxl

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Comments on Israel’s demise

Monday, April 11, 2016

Opuscula

Hands off
May be
Best plan

 

SOME ISRAELIS AND SOME U.S. JEWS are upset because at least one Oval Office candidate had the nerve to suggest a hands off approach to the Israel-PA "problem."

In the past, the White House has mouthed a pro-Israel stance, but acted to the PA's benefit.

The State Department ALWAYS has been not just "pro-PA", but anti-Israel and anti-Jewish. This is nothing new.

OVER THE YEARS, this official two-facedness has done nothing, nada to ensure tranquility between Israel and the PA.

True, Rabin and the then PA boss were more or less - mostly "more" - pushed to the agreement by then-President Wm. Clinton, Hillary's spouse.

Everyone knows how the Oslo Accord worked out.

Rabin, Peres, and the then-leader of the PA got Nobel Peace Prizes for their signatures.

One-time President Jimmy Carter provided the meeting place for the Begin-Sadat discussions that led to The Camp David Accord that in turn led, again "so far," to a lasting peace between Israel and Egypt. Since then Carter has become a leader in the "Blame everything on Israel" crowd

Carter may deserve more recognition than he got; he also was behind an initiative called "A Framework for Peace in the Middle East" that dealt with the Palestinian territories; he wisely forgot to invite the PA. Based on post-Oslo, had the PA signed an agreement it would be worth less than the paper on which it was printed.

Interestingly, neither Clinton nor Carter got a Nobel for their efforts; Obama, however, was given a Nobel after only 12 days in office "for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between people."

Does the term "Arab Spring" conjure up thoughts on Obama's efforts to "strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between people"?

The U.S. is just one of many letting their good intentions pave the road to hell.

A headline in the Jul 20, 2015 issue of the Wall Street Journal reads: EU Exploring Broad Coalition to Push for Renewed Israeli-Palestinian Negotiations.

The article starts off

    BRUSSELS—The European Union, which played a key role in securing the Iran nuclear deal, on Monday said it was now turning its attention to reviving peace talks between the Israelis and Palestinians.

    The effort comes after U.S.-led negotiations collapsed in spring 2014 amid squabbles over Israeli settlements and Palestinian demands for prisoner releases.

    There has been growing frustration within the EU and elsewhere that the Middle East Quartet—a grouping of the EU, the U.S., Russia and the United Nations—has been unable to relaunch serious negotiations, fearing tensions in the region were intensifying.

If nothing else, trying to pressure either Israel or the PA into an agreement is a waste of energy. Likewise, being pro-either party - either blatantly or secretly - has proved equally worthless; once an "honest broker" is unmasked, any progress comes to an immediate halt.

Even "shuttle diplomacy" has proven of no value, possibly due to the shuttling diplomat's known sympathies with one party or the other.

Israel HAS in-place formal peace agreements with Egypt and with Jordan. It has "under-the-table" relations with a number of Muslim countries in the region, none of which was "brokered" by anyone from outside the region. These agreements primarily are trade vs. acceptance of Israeli passports.

Let the Israelis and the PA Arabs find their own grounds to lead to a true, mutually beneficial peace. I suspect such a peace will be based on both populations' non-political requirements - health care, food, housing, jobs with decent compensation.

After all these years and all these heavy-handed attempts to force a true - unlike Oslo - peace agreement between Israel and the PA, maybe the "hands off" approach suggested by one candidate is really the best answer.

'Course the knee jerking jerks on both sides of the political fence will rail against the candidate and claim he is anti-this or pro-that.


More on Obama's Nobel