Showing posts with label Gandhi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gandhi. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 8, 2021

Opuscula

Self-defense:
If not for myself,
Who will be?

KAMAU BOBB, GOOGLE'S FORMER GLOBAL LEAD FOR DIVERSITY STRATEGY AND RESEARCH wrote in a now-deleted 2007 blog post that if he were Jewish, he “would be concerned about my insatiable appetite for war and killing in defense of myself,” and referred to Jews’ “increasing insensitivity to the suffering (of) others.” (https://tinyurl.com/vfs3cs )

 

FORTUNATELY Google removed Bobb from his diversity position after complaints started to embarrass the company.

I will assume — always a foolish thing to do — that Bobb originated on the Indian sub-continent.

His “killing in defense of myself” smacks of Gandhi.

Gandhi and the nazis

Gandhi said: “Hitler killed five million [sic] Jews. It is the greatest crime of our time. But the Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher’s knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs.....It would have aroused the world and the people of Germany.... As it is they succumbed anyway in their millions.” Mahatma Gandhi, June 1946, in an interview with his biographer Louis Fischer. (https://tinyurl.com/3zuw69da)

Unfortunately, Gandhi was wrong; the world was not “aroused” as the nazis slaughtered Jews, Roma, Communists, mentally and physically disabled and anyone else the nazis determined less than human.  

Gandhi and Hitler (https://tinyurl.com/vx6sy6ps)
 

Gandhi also is quoted writing to the English during the war: “This manslaughter must be stopped. You are losing; if you persist, it will only result in greater bloodshed. Hitler is not a bad man.” (https://tinyurl.com/4pr9uvaf)

Gandhi was wrong — again. Hitler most assuredly was a “bad man.”

Did anyone ever prevail by NOT defending himself against murderers?

 

"If I am not for myself, who will be for me? And being only for myself, what am 'I'? And if not now, when?1

 

Had we not defended ourselves

Had Jews not defended themselves in our homeland,

✡.  We would not HAVE a homeland

✡  We would not NEED a homeland since we would be dead at the hands of our “neighbors.”

A little history

1920: Jerusalem and Passover Six Jews were killed and some 200 injured in Jerusalem

1924: Jerusalem 133 Jews and 116 Arabs lay dead

1929: Hebron Death toll was 133 Jews, including eight Americans, and 110 Arabs

1936: April, an Arab attack on a Jewish bus led to a series of incidents that escalated into a major Palestinian rebellion.

1936-39: A total of 415 Jewish deaths were recorded during the Arab Revolt period.

1948: 78 Jews, including 23 women, were killed by gunfire or were burnt when their vehicles were set on fire. A convoy consisting of two ambulances, three buses of medical staff, three logistical trucks and two Haganah armored cars headed up the narrow road to Hadassah Hospital with medical and military supplies with assurances from the occupying English that all was well. It was not.

1948: Independence war; Israel attacked by five Muslim armies (Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, and Egypt. Saudi Arabia) and eventually by English-led Jordan.

1956 Sinai Campaign: Operation Kadesh

1967 Six-Day War

1968-70 War of Attrition

1973 Yom Kippur War

1982 Lebanon War: Operation Peace for Galilee

1991 Gulf War

2006 Second Lebanon War.

Source: (1920-1948) https://tinyurl.com/txxwj3f7 and (1956-2006) https://tinyurl.com/nvxn94c7

The frequent attacks from Lebanon/Syria (Hezbollah) and Gaza (Hamas, Islamic Jihad) are a continuing problem.

Defending against leftists

While Israel manages to fend off physical attacks, it fails to prevent or even mitigate attacks by leftist media and politicians eager to have a soapbox on which to rail against Israel and, increasingly, Jews in general.

According to many in politics and the media, Israel “disproportionally” defends itself. Why “disproportionally?”

1: Body count. Israel protects its citizens — ALL of its citizens: Jew, Muslim, other — with safe rooms, warning sirens, and anti-missile defenses to shoot down incoming mortars and drones.

2: Targeting. Israel precisely targets military assets. When it targets multi-use (military/civilian) assets such as a Hamas HQ/media center, it repeatedly warns the occupants to evacuate; that the site about to be eliminated. Missiles from Gaza and Lebanon/Syria so far have mostly been unguided mortars generally aimed at Israeli civilian areas. This is classified as a “war crime,” but this crime rarely is noted by the media.

It is sadly interesting to note that many of the civilian casualties in Gaza during the Spring 2021 campaign were caused by Hamas/Islamic Jihad missiles than blew up or landed in Gaza.

Israel’s major failure is in the field of “hasbara” — public relations.

It never seems able to get its side of the story published n the “major media,” the name newspapers and tv networks.

As an example: the so-called International Criminal Court (ICC) is charged with investigating and, where warranted, tries individuals charged with the gravest crimes of concern to the international community: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression. (https://www.icc-cpi.int/about).

The ICC intends to investigate Israel for war crimes, but it ignores actual war crimes committed by Israel’s enemies. (The ICC also threatens to investigate and try the United States for crimes presumably committed under the previous administration.) The ICC is encouraged in its witch hunt of Israel by several terrorist organizations, including the PFLP and Hamas.

As far as investigating “crimes against humanity,” the ICC chooses to ignore actual offenders.

Of the 197 countries of the world, there are 20, including three territories, considered to be the most societally repressive. Burma, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Libya, North Korea and Sudan are at the top of the global list for countries that are among the worst abusers of human rights. To be deemed an abuser of human rights, civil liberties and political rights are the violations assessed, and these particular countries mentioned above have concurrently been on such lists in the previous years. (https://tinyurl.com/27kv6k4e)

Human rights groups believe China, although not mentioned above, has detained more than a million Muslim Uighurs over the past few years in what the state defines as "re-education camps".

There is evidence of Uighurs being used as forced labour and of women being forcibly sterilised. (https://tinyurl.com/yuucd3s7)

Despite the above, the ICC only has time to investigate claims leveled by the very people who attack Israel both physically and politically.

The (dis)United Nations has a “Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices.” (https://tinyurl.com/25wv3393) The committee only recognizes complaints, real or imagined, by Israel's enemies.

As an example, “After recent annual consultations with Member States, the United Nations Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices* today expressed deep concern over reports that Israel, while donating surplus COVID-19 vaccines overseas, has failed to fulfill its international legal responsibility and obligation to ensure the vaccination of the Palestinian population in the occupied Palestinian territory. The number of vaccines received so far by the Palestinian people represents only a ‘drop in the sea’, in addressing the overall vaccination needs and containing the COVID-19 pandemic.

Against this background, the Special Committee calls on Israel, as an occupying power, to urgently comply with its international legal obligations, to ensure that Palestinians and Syrians under occupation have access to available vaccines, in accordance with the Fourth Geneva Convention.”

What the “Special Committee” fails to acknowledge is

a. The PLO’s executive refused vaccines from Israel.

b. According to many international law experts, the Oslo Accords specifically place healthcare for Palestinians squarely on the PLO.

c. Israel vaccinated many Palestinians who came into Israel to work (obviously for “selfish reasons” to reduce the spread of the Chinese virus in Israel).

d. Israel allowed Qatar — an enemy state — to land multiple aircraft at Israel’s main international airport with aid for the PLO — aid the PLO rejected because the planes landed at Lod. (Palestine lacks an airport capable of accommodating large commercial aircraft.)

About the only thing the United Nations is united about is castigating Israel at every opportunity and facts be damned.

QUESTION: How much of the above was reported by the media or acknowledged by politicians?

 

To return to Hillel’s question: If I am not for myself,
Who will be for me?

 

 

Sources

1. Hillel HaBavli: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillel_the_Elder

 

 

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Web sites (URLs) beginning https://tinyurl.com/ are generated by the free Tiny URL utility and reduce lengthy URLs to manageable size.

 

 

 

Comment on If I am not for myself

Tuesday, May 7, 2019

Opuscula

Are Netanyahu,
Israel’s gov’t
Really crazy?

INSANITY IS DEFINED AS "DOING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN AND EXPECTING DIFFERENT RESULTS"?
    Attribution: Albert Einstein (or Samuel Langhorne Clemens or Ben Franklin, or ...)

If Einstein, et al, are correct, than Israel’s political and military leaders are “insane.”

Once more they have been conned into a ceasefire guaranteed to last only as long as it takes Hamas and other jihadists to rearm.

Fool me once, shame on you.

Fool me twice, shame on me.

Netanyahu and his sycophantic political and military associates, by the definition of “insane,” must truly BE insane.

Crazy.

Also derelict in their sworn duties to protect Israel and all its citizens, residents, and visitors.

I’m not sure if “Crazy Eddie”1 or “Madman Muntz”2 controls Netanyahu’s decision making process, or if it is one of all of the six (!) Stooges who advise him, but to agree once more — in face of repeated “cease fires while we rearm” appeals from Hamas et al — is the height of irresponsibility.

 

 

Normally I keep silent re Israeli politics.

I’m not there.

But when I see, again and again and again the “modern” Likud’s caving to terrorists while leaving Israeli citizens, residents, and visitors in danger from a “stray” missile or a few hundred stray missiles — it is too much.

What frightens Netanyahu?

The UN?

Leftists?

The UN will condemn Israel no matter what. The only way the UN will have kind words for Israel is when it disappears; when the Israelis — Christians, Jews, Muslims, and whomever else — surrenders their lives as Gandhi proposed during the holocaust. (Gandhi also proposed that the English surrender, telling them to invite the nazis to take over their island, live in their homes.)

 

Gandhi 6 April 1947 quote on Muslims: “If the Muslims want to kill us, we must face death bravely.”

 

Knowing the people condemning Israel now for failing to die at its enemies’ hands will continue to condemn Israel regardless, why don’t Netanyahu and the generals let the army do what armies are trained to do: WIN WARS.

When President Harry S. Truman ordered the bombs dropped on Nagasaki and Hiroshima to end the war with Japan, the world gasped and then got on with life.

When the U.S. and English firebombed Dresden into ashes, the world gasped and moved on. (The fire bombing followed nazi fire bombs on England’s tiny island; just as Hamas missiles fall on Israel from the south and Hezbollah missiles are launched from the north.)

Someone needs to inform Netanyahu and the generals that war is NOT fought by Marquis of Queensbury rules. Germany’s Erwin Rommel had much to say about warfare, words that, along with U.S. Gen. Geo. S. Patton’s thoughts, should be studied in Israel. Neither man would have settled for a cease fire — ESPECIALLY knowing it would be broken by the rearmed enemy in the near future.

It is not mere speculation that Hamas, once rearmed, will again rain missiles on Israel. Next time — and there WILL be a “next time” — Hamas’ missiles may be joined by missiles from Hezbollah. Both are, after all, funded by Iran.

If I recall correctly, Netanyahu sneered at Gen. Ganz, noting he had no political experience. Netanyahu has political experience, but only managed a captain’s rank in the IDF. Perhaps it is time for Israel to follow the American Indian’s practice of having different chiefs for different times; most had a war chief who was in control when, and only when, the tribe was at war. In Israel, let the Ramat Kal — the ranking general — drive the military action.

I suppose the real question is: Is there a general in Israel that the soldiers will follow. I’m not there; I don’t have a clue.

What I DO know is that Netanyahu, by failing to finish the job in Gaza, it giving carte blanc to Hamas to shell and kill more Israeli civilians whenever Hamas feels ready.

No one seems overly concerned with Israeli “collateral damage.” Perhaps Israel should be less concerned about “collateral damage” in Gaza. Alternatively, figure out a way to arm Gazans who want to depose Hamas and similar terrorist organizations. Israel may be reluctant to arm Gazans, recalling that the Afghans, armed by the U.S. to fight the Russians, now use those same arms to kill Americans.

Hammer and anvil; rock and a hard place.

Sources

1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crazy_Eddie

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madman_Muntz

3. http://tinyurl.com/y3bco53n

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on


עינים להם ולא יראו * אזנים להם ולא יאזנו

Comments on INSANE

Tuesday, August 28, 2018

Opuscula

From Gandhi
To Eichmann

BEN KINGSLEY, WHO not too long ago played the pacifist-at-any-price Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi, now stars in a new film as the nazi’s chief death planner, Adolph Eichmann.

Quite a stretch.

At least on the surface.

WILL THE REAL GANDHI PLEASE speak up.

In one of several similar internet articles on Gandhi1, the sage is alleged to have told Jews to give up their lives to the nazis and the English to allow the nazis to take over their island.

    In 1938, he suggested that Jews suffering under Nazism should commit mass suicide to “arouse the world and the people of Germany to Hitler’s violence.” After the Holocaust, he reaffirmed this view:

    “Hitler killed five million Jews. It is the greatest crime of our time. But the Jews should have offered themselves to the butcher’s knife. They should have thrown themselves into the sea from cliffs. As it is, they succumbed anyway in their millions.”

    During World War II, Gandhi offered this advice to the British people:

    “I would like you to lay down the arms you have as being useless for saving you or humanity. You will invite Herr Hitler and Signor Mussolini to take what they want of the countries you call your possessions… If these gentlemen choose to occupy your homes, you will vacate them. If they do not give you free passage out, you will allow yourselves, man, woman, and child, to be slaughtered, but you will refuse to owe allegiance to them.”

Another site2 quotes Gandhi stating:

    “If there ever could be a justifiable war in the name of and for humanity, a war against Germany, to prevent the wanton persecution of a whole race, would be completely justified. But I do not believe in any war. A discussion of the pros and cons of such a war is therefore outside my horizon or province,” Gandhi once said.

    Gandhi wrote to the British during the war, “This manslaughter must be stopped. You are losing; if you persist, it will only result in greater bloodshed. Hitler is not a bad man.” (Emphasis mine.)

    Gandhi’s advice to the Jews was no less bizarre.

    “If I were a Jew and were born in Germany... I would claim Germany as my home even as the tallest gentile German may, and challenge him to shoot me or cast me in the dungeon.... And suffering voluntarily undergone will bring them an inner strength and joy.... The calculated violence of Hitler may even result in a general massacre of the Jews by way of his first answer to the declaration of such hostilities. But if the Jewish mind could be prepared for voluntary suffering, even the massacre I have imagined could be turned into a day of thanksgiving and joy that Jehovah had wrought deliverance of the race even at the hands of the tyrant.”

Obviously Gandhi did not understand the world’s convenient blindness in regard to Jews. His conviction that the slaughter of Jews would cause the world to rise up against the nazis was absolutely incorrect. Even in the U.S., every liberal Jews favorite president, Franklin Delano Roosevelt,

    * Turned away the MS St. Louis with nearly 1,000 Jews trying to escape Eichmann’s death camps3, and
    * Refused to let U.S. bombers destroy railroad tracks and death camps over which they were flying to and from approved targets4, 5

ADOLPH EICHMANN is less complicated that Gandhi.

According to Wikipedia6, Eichmann had no regrets. He was quoted in Life magazine, while awaiting trial, “To sum it all up, I must say that I regret nothing.” Two other quotes from the same source deserve attention.

    ”Whether they were bank directors or mental cases, the people who were loaded on those trains meant nothing to me. It was really none of my business.

    “I was never an anti-Semite. … My sensitive nature revolted at the sight of corpses and blood... I personally had nothing to do with this. My job was to observe and report on it.”

A biography7 might give a clue to Eichmann’s hatred of Jews. “As a boy, Eichmann was teased about his looks and dark complexion and was nicknamed "the little Jew" by classmates.

He studied all aspects of Jewish culture, attended Jewish meetings and often visited Jewish sections of cities while taking volumes of notes. He became familiar with the issue of Zionism, studied Hebrew and could even speak a bit of Yiddish. He gradually became the acknowledged 'Jewish specialist,' realizing this could have positive implications for his career in the SS.

He soon attracted the attention of Heydrich and SS Reichsführer Heinrich Himmler who appointed Eichmann to head a newly created SD Scientific Museum of Jewish Affairs.

Eichmann was then assigned to investigate possible "solutions to the Jewish question." He visited Palestine in 1937 to discuss the possibility of large scale immigration of Jews to the Middle East with Arab leaders. British authorities, however, ordered him out of the country.

The “Final Solution” was really the nazis’ final plan – all others either having failed or proven too telling on the killers’ psyches – came about in 1942.

    On July 31, 1941 Heydrich was told by Göring to prepare "a general plan of the administrative material and financial measures necessary for carrying out the desired Final Solution of the Jewish question."

    In January 1942 Eichmann helped Heydrich organize the Wannsee Conference in Berlin during which Heydrich and Eichmann along with 15 Nazi bureaucrats planned the extermination of the entire Jewish population of Europe and the Soviet Union, estimated at 11 million persons.

With the end in sight, Eichmann, disobeying orders, had “another 50,000 Hungarian Jews rounded up and forced on an eight day death march to Austria.”

Even awaiting trial in Jerusalem, Eichmann remained true to his dementia (ibid.).

In 1950, with the help of the SS underground, he fled to Argentina and lived under the assumed name of Ricardo Klement for ten years until Israeli Mossad agents abducted him on May 11, 1960.

Eichmann went on trial in Jerusalem for crimes against the Jewish people, crimes against humanity and war crimes. During the four months of the trial over 100 witnesses testified against him. Eichmann took the stand and used the defense that he was just obeying orders. "Why me," he asked. "Why not the local policemen, thousands of them? They would have been shot if they had refused to round up the Jews for the death camps. Why not hang them for not wanting to be shot? Why me? Everybody killed the Jews."

From Encyclopaedia Britannia8:

    Following the war, U.S. troops captured Eichmann, but in 1946 he escaped from a prison camp. After dodging in and out of the Middle East for several years, Eichmann settled in Argentina in 1958. He was arrested by Israeli secret service agents near Buenos Aires, Argentina, on May 11, 1960; nine days later they smuggled him out of the country and took him to Israel. After settling the controversy that arose over this Israeli violation of Argentine law, the Israeli government arranged his trial before a special three-judge court in Jerusalem. Eichmann’s trial was controversial from the beginning. The trial—before Jewish judges by a Jewish state that did not exist until three years after the Holocaust—gave rise to accusations of ex post facto justice. Some called for an international tribunal to try Eichmann, and others wanted him tried in Germany, but Israel was insistent. At stake was not only justice but also honour, as well as an opportunity to educate a new generation about the Holocaust.

Perhaps Kingsley’s portrayal of of Eichmann will enhance the world’s curiosity about the Holocaust and the people who murdered more than 12 million civilians and caused the deaths of thousands of soldiers.

Kingsley told the Associated Press9 that “he didn't portray Adolf Eichmann out of love or admiration. Rather, he wanted to "nail him to the gates of Auschwitz.”

The actor said he “dedicated my performance to Elie Wiesel and the millions who lost their lives under [Eichmann's] command" 

* * * * * * *

There is another Eichmann movie, a YouTube film made in 2016.

The movie revolves around Eichmann’s time in Israel prior to the trial.

The URL is https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuhR59GK-vw


Sources

1. http://tinyurl.com/ybtu6k74

2. http://tinyurl.com/yclrepnp

3. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MS_St._Louis

4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auschwitz_bombing_debate

5. http://tinyurl.com/y8uugvuq

6. https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Adolf_Eichmann

7. http://tinyurl.com/yzpz2o

8. https://www.britannica.com/biography/Adolf-Eichmann

9. http://tinyurl.com/y7lzhwtf

PLAGIARISM is the act of appropriating the literary composition of another, or parts or passages of his writings, or the ideas or language of the same, and passing them off as the product of one’s own mind.

Truth is an absolute defense to defamation. Defamation is a false statement of fact. If the statement was accurate, then by definition it wasn’t defamatory.

Comments on Gandhi & Eichmann